PENGUATAN SINERGI DAN STRATEGI KOLABORASI STAKEHOLDER UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN EKONOMI KREATIF DI JAWA TENGAH
Abstract
Creative economy development has two major agendas: the development of the creative economy subsector and the development of its supporting ecosystem. Both agendas are the responsibility of the central and local governments, as mandated by Law No. 24 of 2019 concerning the Creative Economy. However, the implementation of creative economy policies in the regions constrains the limited capacity, authority, and resources of local governments. Consequently, creative economy development is less effective if it is solely the responsibility of local governments. The Central Java Provincial Government has enacted Regional Regulation No. 5 of 2021 concerning Creative Economy Development and Governor Regulation No. 26 of 2024 concerning the implementation of Regional Regulation 5 of 2021, as the basis for regional creative economy ecosystem development policies. These policies are expected to be effective if implemented with a collaborative and synergistic approach involving multiple actors, multiple sectors, multiple roles, and multiple accountabilities. The study identified the existence of a multi-actor octahelix system consisting of government, academics, businesses, creative economy communities, media, financial institutions, NGOs/CSOs, and orchestrator institutions. Furthermore, it is recommended to establish a collaborative and synergistic multi-actor space for resource sharing within the Provincial Creative Economy Action Plan. The role of the Central Java Creative Economy Committee as an orchestrator of multi-actor collaboration and synergy to build a dynamic and adaptive ecosystem needs to be continuously strengthened.
References
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model : global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. 72–73.
Chris Huxham, S. V. (2004). Managing to Collaborate The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. Routledge.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation : from National Systems and ‘“ Mode 2 ”’ to a Triple Helix of university – industry – government relations. 109–123.
Florida, R. (2003). Cities and Creative Class. City and Community, 2(1), 3–19.
Hawkins, J. (2001). The Creative Economy ; How People Make Money From Ideas. Penguin Group.
Iluta Arbidane, Halina Synycyna, Daina Znotina, O. R. (2023). Theoretical and Methodological Aspects for the Development of a Creative Economy in the Context of the Formation of an Innovative Business Ecosystem. Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific and Practical Conference, 1, 22–28.
Muhammad Usman, M. A. (2021). General Policy Alienation and Public Professionals’ Psychological Wellbeing: Mediation through Alienative Commitment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa043
Ode, L., & Elwan, M. (2025). COLLABORATION IN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY : TRANSITIONING FROM A QUADRUPLE HELIX TO A HEXA- HELIX PERSPECTIVE. 24(4). https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-25-24-4-14
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
Rahmah, M., Yayuk, A., Rahayu, S., & Maksum, I. R. (2025). NEW TRENDS OF IDEAL TYPE : ADDRESSING WICKED. 24(2). https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-25-24-2-01
Sutaryantha, Wiyantari M. P., & Kusumasari, B. (2020). Indigenous Collaborative Governance: An Understanding of Decision-Making Process at Desa Adat in Bali, Indonesia. Udayana Journal of Law and Culture, 4(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.24843/UJLC.2020.v04.i02.p01
